Friday, 19 February 2010

Computers can translate all kinds of languages well so our children don't need to learn more languages in the future?

Advancing research into natural language processing has made it possible to translate a text from one language into another language with better accuracy. It is, then, tempting to conclude that computers will take on an increasingly important role as interpreters, effectively diminishing the importance of bilingualism. However, for the reasons that will be mentioned in this essay, I believe that although linguistic improvements should be welcome, these developments do not make it unnecessary to learn foreign languages.

First of all, while translation programs can handle far more languages than what an individual can learn, when it comes to accuracy, humans are far better. This is because the rigidity with which computers process information is no match for the creative and flexible way in which humans interpret. Since natural languages are largely idiomatic, the difference is significant and to be able to cope with such situations, children should be encouraged to study foreign languages.

Furthermore, it can be argued that machine translators remove the barriers that prevent people who speak minority languages from accessing knowledge written in globally spoken languages such as English. For example, many rural Indians have benefitted from OM (one tool for many languages) on Simputer (short for simple computer). Ironically, the process of learning a foreign language, a process that involves learning a new culture, can help children learn equal opportunity so that they are more ready to participate in global economy.

Finally, if children can avoid the time-consuming route to mastering a foreign tongue, they may be able to spend more time on subjects which will help with their development. However, the truth is that language study is a very fruitful course of action. For instance, there is growing evidence from research to suggest that bilingualism and cognitive development go hand in hand. Hence, children gain valuable skills which will later speed up the study of other subjects.

On balance, it has to be conceded that the development of translation capabilities in computers has brought several benefits. Nevertheless, this development is not enough reason to stop teaching foreign languages in schools. Such a policy might disadvantage the future generation in a profound way.

2 comments: